Skip to main content

Promote diverse age structure

Approach

A diverse age structure can be beneficial because trees are most vulnerable to specific stressors at different ages. For example, droughts are typically more damaging to seedlings than to mature trees, whereas older individuals may be more susceptible to damage from wind events. In many cases, urban forests are dominated by trees that persisted on the landscape as it became urbanized, and many of these trees are reaching the end of their lifespan. Active management may be necessary to promote regeneration and development of younger age classes. Furthermore, in developed urban areas, managers often focus on individual trees, which are removed upon death or damage and replanted as soon as resources permit). Age class diversification may consequently be less straightforward than in natural forests. However, a diverse age structure in these locations could increase the habitat value of the urban forest and spread out tree losses from natural mortality. In developed urban sites, some planting and tree removal practices could help develop a more diverse tree age structure both within and among management units.

Tactics

  • Urban natural areas: Using group selection to promote multiaged forest stands.
  • Urban natural areas: Restoring or creating conditions that allow tree seedlings to thrive by removing nonnative species in the shrub layer and canopy trees.
  • Developed urban sites: Planting replacement trees in anticipation of mortality from emerald ash borer and before actual loss of canopy trees in order to diversify age structures.
  • Developed urban sites: Rotating planting schedules so that removal and replanting is dispersed geographically, thereby avoiding complete removal or planting within a single area (e.g. street or park) during a single year.

Strategy

Strategy Text

Promoting species and structural diversity is as important in urban forests as in nonurbanized forest landscapes, if not more so. Urban areas are highly susceptible to introduction of nonnative pests and pathogens and often exhibit high occurrence of invasive plant species. Urban forests have been decimated because of a lack of species diversity in the face of pest introductions. Widespread acknowledgement of this problem has led to guidelines focused on diversification of the urban forest. However, urban areas contain difficult sites, and only a limited set of tree species may be able to tolerate the conditions of many of these sites. Species and structural diversity are especially important as a climate adaptation strategy because urban habitats (both natural areas and urban land uses) are likely to be stressed in the future in many ways, some of which will be unforeseeable. A diverse set of species, carefully selected to match the urban environment, will be more likely to maintain adequate forest cover and ecosystem services under a changing and increasingly variable climate.

Swanston, C.W.; Janowiak, M.K.; Brandt, L.A.; Butler, P.R.; Handler, S.D.; Shannon, P.D.; Derby Lewis, A.; Hall, K.; Fahey, R.T.; Scott, L.; Kerber, A.; Miesbauer, J.W.; Darling, L.; 2016. Forest Adaptation Resources: climate change tools and approaches for land managers, 2nd ed. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. 161 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.2737/NRS-GTR-87-2,

RELATED TO THIS APPROACH:

Climate Change Effect

Resource Area

Relevant Region

Caribbean
Midwest
Northeast
Northern Plains
Northwest
Southeast
Southern Plains
Southwest